Proposed solidarity statement from Portland

The following is a statement in solidarity with Occupy Oakland and against the OPD and Jean Quan. It is set to go before the Occupy Portland GA on Sunday.

City of Oakland, Oakland Police, and Mayor Quan,

On January 28th, 2012, Occupy Oakland took to the streets and attempted to turn an abandoned building into a social center to converge and organize and to continue to provide the community at large with the  services they had been providing before their encampment was disbanded.  In response,  Oakland Police used  rubber bullets, bean bag shot gun rounds, chemical weapons, and kettling techniques and arrested 400 people in order to terrorize political dissent into submission.  Mayor Quan issued a call to ‘the national leadership of the Occupy Movement’ to disown the actions of Occupy Oakland.

Your request for Occupy Wall Street and the other occupations to “disown” Occupy Oakland shows a failure to understand the nature of this movement and does a disservice to those you were elected to represent.  Oakland wants change, and so do we.  Rubber bullets and tear gas are violence, opening a social center is not.  The use of physical violence against Occupiers is a disgrace.  The arrest of journalists, even after those journalists showed press credentials to officers, is a disgrace and a disturbing continuation of a larger trend of silencing the press in this country.  We stand with our fellow Occupiers, not with a city and mayor that condones the use of violence against non-violent protestors and those building community in the face of struggle.  It is you, Mayor Quan, who must answer to the rest of the Occupy movement and not our brethren at Occupy Oakland.

If our cities spent as much money providing services for the hungry and houseless citizens as they did cracking down on the Occupy movement and if the federal government spent as much money on confronting social and environmental problems as it does on waging war and on bail-outs for the financial industry, then we would not have nearly as much cause to Occupy in Solidarity with one another.  Until our elected leaders, including you Mayor Quan, stand with those who are building community and peacefully assembling rather than with those who are injuring and bullying citizens on the streets of Oakland, we will Occupy in Solidarity with one another.  Until you respect the right to freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press, we will Occupy in Solidarity with one another.

When Occupiers anywhere are confronted with police brutality, Occupiers everywhere will stand with them.  We issue the following statement to law enforcement and city government engaging in the silencing of dissent or asking us to disown our brethren everywhere:

When you use chemical weapons, rubber bullets, bean bags, or other violence, when you kettle and arrest in mass non-violent protesters, we will not be silenced or divided.  When occupiers anywhere are brutalized, occupiers everywhere will stand with them.

Denied medication at Santa Rita

The following is from CL, a woman who was detained in Santa Rita on Saturday, January 28, and was one of many people denied her medications.

The first person I notified about my need for medication was my arresting officer (Hazelwood). I believe he noted it somewhere in my paperwork. He told me that I would be able to see a nurse at Santa Rita, and that they have several antidepressants available there.

Before being put in a holding cell (around 12:30AM Sunday morning), an officer reading from a form asked me if I had any medical/mental health issues. When I answered in the affirmative, he had a nurse come over to finish the form. I told the nurse that I have severe depression and panic disorders, and that I had not had my medication (Celexa, which I’m supposed to take 2x/day) in the past 24 hours. The nurse signed the form to indicate that I was cleared to be put into a holding cell. Several times over the course of the night and next day, I and a few others in my cell told guards outside that we needed medication, but were ignored.

At some point on Sunday afternoon I had a mild but prolonged panic attack, where I had difficulty breathing and controlling my muscles. Around 5PM on Sunday, a guard asked for the women who needed medication to come out of the holding cell, and said we would be processed and seen by a nurse. We were then fingerprinted and had mug shots taken. I again asked if I could see a nurse and explained my condition. I was told that I would not be able to see a nurse unless I wanted to stay in jail. The officer also stated that I would be getting out the following morning (Monday).

Around midnight, we were released.

Also – I know this is secondhand, but of the other women I was with who needed medical attention, M needed anxiety meds (Lexapro), which she had with her on being taken to jail, but were removed and denied to her; L was supposed to have 3 antidepressants/anti-anxiety prescriptions (Effexor, Wellbutrin, and Lorazepam); and C needed Prilosec, an anti-acid, in order to eat (she has a systemic bacterial
infection and ulcers – if she generates acid while eating, it can cause ulcers to burst and go septic). None of us were allowed to see a nurse after being put in a holding cell, and none of us were given medication.

City Cuts Employees, Citizens Out of the Loop

Employees demanded better treatment from Oakland City Council at their January 25 meeting.

City leaders are rushing to cut $20.3M from the city budget by cutting hundreds of jobs in response to the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency happening February 1. Oakland City Council held an emergency meeting Wednesday night, January 25, to discuss a budget amendment from Mayor Jean Quan and City Administrator Deanna Santana to account for the $28M loss of redevelopment funds. The plan, up for a final vote on Tuesday, January 31, involves layoffs and a major redesign of city departments.

This hurriedness, deemed necessary by Santana and her staff, was easily avoidable. California Governor Jerry Brown put all redevelopment agencies on the chopping block in January 2011 and then swung the axe when he signed AB-126 in June. Oakland joined in a lawsuit challenging Brown’s authority to remove the funds, but the California Supreme Court ruled in December that the action was legal.

Hoping for the best with the lawsuit is justifiable, yet it is ridiculous to wait until December 30, 2011 to make a plan of action when city officials had the entire year to discuss changes, talk to employees, and receive public input. Now the 114-page budget amendment, which lacks a complete budget breakdown, is up for a final vote with layoffs beginning February 3.

Continue reading

Coalition Says No to Occupy Injunctions

For Immediate Release—January 30, 2012 

Press Contact:  Isaac Ontiveros

                        Stop the Injunctions Coalition

                        Ph.  510-444-0484

Oakland—During a press conference and several interviews Sunday, both Mayor Jean Quan and Oakland Police Chief Howard Jordan said they would seek to target protesters with civil “stay away” orders in an attempt to keep them from participating in Occupy Oakland activities.  Oakland’s Stop the Injunctions Coalition (STIC) is calling the OPD Chief and Quan’s plan an overt attempt to expand the use of injunctions inOakland despite the fact that the Oakland City Council voted to prevent the expansion of civil gang injunctions pending additional assessment.

Oakland has already spent over $1 million on two temporary injunctions in North Oakland and the Fruitvale, targeting the movement and associations of alleged gang members.  Oakland’s gang injunctions were met with sustained protest throughout the last eighteen months and have been widely condemned as ineffective, divisive, costly, and further institutionalizing police use of racial profiling.  The OPD’s own report on the North Oakland Injunction found it to be ineffective in preventing or addressing violent harm in that neighborhood.

“The Mayor and OPD’s proposal to use injunctions or stay away orders against organizers is disturbing in many different ways,” says Rachel Herzing of the Stop the Injunctions Coalition. “They are openly targeting and criminalizing the political activity of Oakland residents.  They are proposing using a police tool that has been repeatedly debunked and that the city council has specifically voted against expanding.  What’s more, they are proposing that the notoriously violent OPD, which is on the brink of federal receivership, be given yet another tool to expand their powers against this city’s residents.”

In opposing the North Oakland and Fruitvale injunctions, STIC has continuously highlighted the affects of police violence on communities of color in Oakland as well as the disparities between police spending and education, sustainable housing, and healthcare spending.  “The discontent around jobs, budget cuts, housing, and healthcare that are being amplified worldwide by the Occupy movement have been at the core of demands that marginalized communities have been making for generations” says Maisha Quint, STIC member and cultural worker at Eastside Arts Alliance. “Instead of addressing the roots of the situation, the Mayor and OPD once again are trying to police their way out of the problem.  This has not worked historically, and it certainly won’t work now.”

### 

Isaac Ontiveros

Communications Director 

Critical Resistance

1904 Franklin St #504

Oakland CA 94612

510.444.0484

510.444.2177 (fax)

510.517.6612 (cell)

isaac@criticalresistance.org

 

PRESS RELEASE: Oakland Police Violate their Own Policies

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

January 29, 2011 – Oakland, CA – Yesterday, the Oakland Police deployed hundreds of officers in riot gear so as to prevent Occupy Oakland from putting a vacant building to better use. This is a building which has sat vacant for 6 years, and the city has no current plans for it. The Occupy Oakland GA passed a proposal calling for the space to be turned into a social center, convergence center and headquarters of the Occupy Oakland movement.

The police actions tonight cost the city of Oakland hundreds of thousands of dollars, and they repeatedly violated their own crowd control guidelines and protester’s civil rights.

With all the problems in our city, should preventing activists from putting a vacant building to better use be their highest priority? Was it worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars they spent?

The OPD is facing receivership based on actions by police in the past, and they have apparently learned nothing since October. On October 25, Occupiers rushed to the aid of Scott Olsen who was shot in the head by police, and the good Samaritans who rushed to his aid had a grenade thrown at them by police. At 3:30pm this afternoon, OO medics yet again ran to the aid of injured protesters lying on the ground. Other occupiers ran forward and used shields to protect the medic and injured man. The police then repeatedly fired less lethal rounds at these people trying to protect and help an injured man.

Around the same time, officers #419, #327, and others were swinging batons at protesters in a violation of OPD crowd control policy, which allows for pushing or jabbing with batons, but not the swinging of them.

In the evening, police illegally kettled and arrested hundreds of protesters. Police can give notices to disperse, if a group is engaged in illegal activity. However, if the group disperses and reassembles somewhere else, they are required to give another notice to disperse. Tonight, they kettled a march in progress, and arrested hundreds for refusing to disperse. Contrary to their own policy, the OPD gave no option of leaving or instruction on how to depart. These arrests are completely illegal, and this will probably result in another class action lawsuit against the OPD, who have already cost Oakland $58 million in lawsuits over the past 10 years.

OPD Crowd Control Policy: “If after a crowd disperses pursuant to a declaration of unlawful assembly and subsequently participants assemble at a different geographic location where the participants are engaged in non-violent and lawful First Amendment activity, such an assembly cannot be dispersed unless it has been determined that it is an unlawful assembly and the required official declaration has been adequately given.”

“The announcements shall also specify adequate egress or escape routes. Whenever possible, a minimum of two escape/egress routes shall be identified and announced.”

“When the only violation present is unlawful assembly, the crowd should be given an opportunity to disperse rather than face arrest.”

At least 4 journalists were arrested in this kettling. They include Susie Cagle, Kristen Hanes, Vivian Ho who were arrested and then released, and Gavin Aronsen who was taken to jail.

One woman was in terrible pain from the cuffs. Dozens of fellow arrestees shouted at the OPD to check her cuffs. But, contrary to their own policy, the OPD refused and simply threw her in a paddy wagon.

OPD Crowd Control Policy: “Officers should be cognizant that flex-cuffs may tighten when arrestees’ hands swell or move … When arrestees complain of pain from overly tight flex cuffs, members shall examine the cuffs to ensure proper fit”

Numerous protesters were injured: some shot with “less lethal” rounds, some affected by tear gas, and some beaten by police batons. There are no totals yet for the numbers of protesters injured. One 19 year old woman was taken to the hospital with internal bleeding after she was beaten by Officer #119.

Cathy Jones, an attorney with the NLG gave the following statement to Occupy Oakland’s media team: “Through everything that has happened since September, from Occupy to the acceleration of “Bills” — NDAA, SOPA, PIPA, ACTA — never have I felt so helpless and enraged as I do tonight. These kids are heroes, and the rest of the country needs to open its collective eyes and grab what remains of its civil rights, because they are evaporating, quickly. Do you want to know what a police state looks like? Well, you sure as hell still do not know unless you were watching our citizen journalists.”

Today, Occupy Oakland events continue all day with a festival in Oscar Grant (Frank Ogawa) Plaza:

http://occupyoakland.org/2012/01/occupy-oakland-rise-up-festival-has-been-moved-to-oscar-grant-plaza-tomorrow/

Occupy Oakland is an emerging social movement without leaders or spokespersons. It is in solidarity with occupations currently occurring around the world in solidarity with Occupy Wall Street. Occupy Oakland Media is a committee of Occupy Oakland, established by the Occupy Oakland General Assembly.

CONTACT:

Occupy Oakland Media Committee
(510) 473-6250
media@occupyoakland.org

http://hellaoccupyoakland.org

Thank you for your support!

The Occupied Oakland Tribune Kickstarter fund was fully funded! This means that our issue premiering today as well as the Prisoner Solidarity issue premiering February 20 are fully funded. Thanks for your support!

To continue to support the OOT, please consider donating to our WePay fund. This will help us mail the Prisoner Solidarity issue to the men on Death Row in San Quentin as well as begin funding issues after February.

Donate with WePay