They Came in the Night… To Evict the Books.

By JP Massar

First they came for the anarchist books,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t an anarchist.

Then they came for the trade union books,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for the religious and political books,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t religious or political.

Then they came for me, and I objected,
But they had already seized the books with the Bill of Rights in them.

They came, as usual, in the middle of the night. Fifty or so of them, armed to the teeth and ready to carry out their mission. They came not to occupy, but… to remove the books.

Oakland Police evicted the first Occupants in many years of the abandoned building at 1449 Miller Street late on August 13th. That was the same day the abandoned building had been proclaimed a people’s library and public space, a Biblioteca Popul for a neighborhood in East Oakland sorely in need.

The keepers of the books were undaunted. The next morning they were back. They decided to re-establish the library on the sidewalk. Kids came. The children wanted to restart the garden, now inaccessible out back, and so a sidewalk garden was started. More kids came, some asking for books about dragons. Perhaps someone found them The Hobbit or The Chronicles of Pern, I can’t say for sure.

More people came, some dropping off books, some browsing, some borrowing. The book keepers announced a pot luck dinner, and then kept vigil through the night. For four days, with the Oakland Police hovering threateningly in idling cars just tens of yards away, they kept at it.

On Friday, they tweeted their announcement of a BBQ and community meeting for Saturday. The Occupy Oakland BBQ Committee, having previously proclaimed its own dissolution, nonetheless did not hesitate. Back they came, rivaling Lazarus, and with a little help from their friends…

produced, by 2:00 PM, one of the finest spreads in East Oakland.

Photobucket

The story continues: click here for the complete tale.

curfew_4745

The Case Against Curfews

By JP Massar

Oakland Police Chief Howard Jordan wants a curfew. In the widespread absence of appropriate “parental controls” Jordan says a curfew is critical to reduce the risks posed by teens and younger children hanging out late at night in some of the city’s most dangerous neighborhoods. He says he wants to assemble and lead a community-wide effort to get the City Council to pass a curfew ordinance before the end of the calendar year. — Chip Johnson, columnist, writing in the San Francisco Chronicle 8/2/12

There is little factual basis for the idea that curfews have any significant effect on crime or safety. Furthermore, there has been no attempt that I have been able to find to discuss a balance between the restrictions on freedom and the inevitable harassment of young people that curfew laws mandate versus any alleged benefit. Curfew laws seem to exist because adults simply assume they are a good idea, and because police organizations support curfews.

Many curfew laws were imposed in the 1990s before there were any academic studies on curfews. Studies from 1998 to 2003 suggested that there was no measurable benefit to curfew laws. For example

There is no support for the hypothesis that jurisdictions with curfews experience lower crime levels, accelerated youth crime reduction, or lower rates of juvenile violent death than jurisdictions without curfews. (1999)

and

…the evidence does not support the argument that curfews prevent crime and victimization. Juvenile crime and victimization are most likely to remain unchanged after implementation of curfew laws… (2003)

In 2006 (with a 2010 revision) Patrick Kline at UC Berkeley published a paper which suggested that

…being subject to a curfew reduces the number of violent and property crimes committed by juveniles below the curfew age by approximately 10% in the year after enactment, with the effects intensifying substantially in subsequent years for violent crimes.

If any kind of scientific rationale is presented to the Oakland City Council justifying a curfew this would probably be it. However a single paper, when two other studies suggest otherwise, should not make a convincing argument.

Curfews are widespread in the United States. Seventy-eight of the ninty-two largest cities in America have some sort of teenage curfew or another. Many of California’s biggest cities — Los Angeles, San Jose, San Diego and San Francisco — have curfews. Given this, it is somewhat surprising that Oakland does not currently have a curfew law. Curfew laws generally restrict anyone below a certain age from being in public places, in vehicles or in ‘establishments’ during certain late-evening and early-morning hours. Restricted hours may differ on weekends from weekdays. Some curfew laws are also in effect during school hours.

Continue reading »

Living On Top Of A Police-Fueled Powder Keg.

There is growing outrage over the police violence that took place in Anaheim, California yesterday.

Photobucket

Among other things police shot rubber bullets into an unarmed crowd and one released (or inadvertently let go of) an attack dog which attacked a mother and her child. And while the police violence against these citizens was shocking, unjustified, absurd, obscene and demented, what has been overshadowed by it all is the cause of the protest.

Earlier in the day, police had approached three black males; they fled, the police gave chase, and at least according to one eyewitness, one of the officers shot one of the men in the back and then in the head. He died hours later.

Crystal Ventura, a 17-year-old who lives in the neighborhood, said she saw the shooting from about 20 feet away. She said the man had his back to the officer. She said the man was shot in the buttocks area. The man then went down on his knees, and she said he was struck by another bullet in the head.

The protest arose as community members gathered, angry at the police in general and enraged over yet one more example of police gunning down one of their own.

Daisy Gonzalez, 16, identified her uncle as the man shot by police. She … said his name was Manuel Diaz. She said he likely ran away from officers when they approached him because of his past experience with law enforcement… “He never liked them because all they do is harass and arrest anyone,” Gonzalez said after lighting a candle for her uncle. She cursed at the police who were nearby and a police helicopter that hovered above…

Click here for the full story with its linkage to Alan Blueford.

Elaine Brown, Former Chair of the Black Panthers, Speaks to Occupy Oakland and All Occupiers.

Elaine Brown has been many things. Chair of the Black Panther Party from 1974 until 1977. Candidate for Oakland City Council. Candidate for the nomination of the Green Party for President of the United States. Founder of various nonprofits. Advocate for radical prison reform and prison strike organizer.

She has been a supporter and advocate for Occupy Oakland, a featured speaker at many of its events, and a participant in the December 12th Port Shutdown. In early 2012 she dressed down the Oakland City Council, its female and African American members in particular, for turning their backs on the principles that she and others fought for and which ultimate allowed them to be elected to their positions.

Yesterday, July 15th, she spoke to the Occupy Oakland General Assembly. After her talk, she said that she would not vote on proposals, because she did not consider herself a member. She was “shouted down” and by unanimous “consent” proclaimed a member of Occupy Oakland.

Power to the People

Click here for the video of her speech, a transcript of her speech, and a video of Elaine dressing down the Oakland City Council back in January, 2012.

Yet Another Police Riot. All Holy Hell Broke out in Los Angeles.

A girl was drawing hopscotch. A guy next to her wrote ‘I want peace.’ The next thing, they started arresting people. Everything was calm before the riot police showed up.”

The basics from Huffington Post:

Riot police formed skirmish lines in the streets of downtown Los Angeles Thursday night in response to what appeared to be a demonstration over the right to draw with chalk…

Several people were arrested, said LAPD Officer Karen Rayner to HuffPost, although she couldn’t confirm the exact number. When asked if drawing on the ground with chalk is illegal, Rayner said, “It’s not vandalism because it’s not permanent, but I don’t really know.”…

Charlie Shepard, who was in the area for Art Walk, told NBC4 that he was shot with a rubber bullet. “I was walking down the street and I saw a group of people. I was just here for Art Walk, I didn’t know anything was gonna happen,” Shepard said.

“Went out to grab something from 7-11 and got shot in eye by ‪#LAPD‬!”

Click here for more of the story, tweets as they happened Thursday night about 11:00 PM, more pictures and comments.

“Let Me Break It Down For You.” OaklandElle Lays Out Her Case Against the Oakland Police.

An Annotated Twitter Essay by OaklandElle

“Let me break it down for people who don’t live in Oakland and don’t see the day-to-day effects of OPD on our community.

“To start with, OPD starting salary is ~$74k/year, not including OT, which is more than even city council members make. (More on them later)

“Now, UNLIKE City Council members, OPD officers are not required to live in Oakland. What that means is their salaries LEAVE our community.

“ie: because ((the vast majority of)) OPD does not live in our city, their salaries, which are paid by our taxes, do not get recycled back into the community.

“Not only that, but because OPD does not live in this community, they neither understand it, nor are they accountable to it.

“Because of the lack of understanding and accountability, OPD officers frequently act completely inappropriately.

Oakland Police Officer Hector Jimenez shot 27-year-old Jody Woodfox in the back on July 25, 2008…

Click here for the complete essay.

Photobucket

“A Military-Style Vehicle Is Not The Best Choice For A University Setting.”

Recall from several days ago that UC Berkeley Police, the City of Berkeley Police (unbeknowst to their City Council), and the City of Albany Police Departments had submitted an application for a Bearcat armored vehicle to the Department of Homeland Security.

Amazingly enough, expressing enough outrage and subjecting the planned acquisition to sufficient ridicule was enough to change some important people’s minds.

The statement below regarding plans for the joint acquisition of an armored emergency rescue vehicle was issued today (Thursday, July 5th) by UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau, in coordination with the mayors of Berkeley and Albany.

The University of California Police Department, in collaboration with the Berkeley and Albany city police departments, recently pursued a grant for an armored emergency rescue vehicle. Law enforcement’s interest in obtaining a vehicle that would protect officers during situations involving oncoming gunfire (or to rescue victims during such situations) — such as occurred at Oikos University in Oakland a few months ago — is understandable.

However, the planned acquisition of the vehicle recently came to the attention of campus and city officials. Campus administrators evaluated the proposal and concluded that such a military-style vehicle is not the best choice for a university setting. UC Berkeley officials are in the process of canceling the order for the vehicle. Officials in Berkeley and Albany agree with the University’s decision.

Robert Birgeneau, Chancellor, University of California, Berkeley
Tom Bates, Mayor of Berkeley
Farid Javandel, Mayor of Albany

Reprinted from Daily Kos. Click for full article and comments.

Oakland City Council Kisses Policeman’s Ass to the Tune of $40,000.

Some things are just so ridiculous that you couldn’t possibly make them up.

Seven years ago an Oakland police officer forced two men he had stopped to pull down their pants in front of spectators. After a lawsuit was brought and the City refused to settle, last year’s verdict resulted in losses to Oakland’s taxpayers of more than $1,000,000. You might have thought that at this point the City would have said no mas.

But you would be wrong. You have no concept to what depths of ass-kissing the people of Oakland’s representatives will go when there are police involved. (And quite frankly, even I was surprised at the giant sucking sounds emerging from City Hall last evening…)

The Oakland City Council voted Tuesday to pay $40,000 in punitive damages that a judge had ordered a former Oakland police officer to pay for making two men pull down their pants in public.

The city had no legal obligation to make ((officer)) Mayer’s payment, but the council voted 5-3 to do it anyway.

((City Council member)) Brooks said the police union had recently asked council members to indemnify Mayer.

Photobucket

Click here and read the complete article at Daily Kos

And Now They Are Coming For You

By Anonymous

The image of five men circulates through the news media and around the internet.  A few weeks later, a new story, this time the mugshots of three more men flash on the screen, followed by the pictures of two other men in the following days. 

The ten white men are in serious trouble, something about “terrorism” from the sounds of it, but the situation is very confusing.  One thing is clear: informants were involved in all of these cases, and that they developed friendships with these young men in order to entrap them.

In most of the cases it seems the men are charged with nothing more than talking, yet they are facing lengthy prison sentences.

How did we get to this point?

Background

Late 2002- 20,000 feet above the ocean a young man lies on the cold metal floor of an airplane, his arms and legs affixed to metal posts by sturdy canvass straps.  His captors speak a language he does not understand, yet they constantly scream at him, their mouths just inches from his face.  He is afraid.

The airplane lands somewhere outside of an Eastern European capital.  He is placed in a van and driven away from the makeshift airport.  They arrive at what appears to be a small office building on the outskirts of a city.

This place does not exist on any map.

Inside the building are not offices but 6 tiny damp cells.  The cells have no sinks or benches.  There is not even a toilet.   He is forced to the ground and, once again, his arms and legs are strapped down.

A hood is thrown over his head and he feels water running down his body.  His captors are yelling.  He cannot breathe. 

In the past decade, thousands of Muslims have been subjected to the most disturbing forms of incarceration and interrogation imaginable.  Of those incarcerated, most were never officially charged.  Many did not survive the ordeal.

Extraordinary rendition, the extrajudicial abduction and international transport of a person for the purpose of interrogation, became commonplace during the “war on terror”.   Countless people who were never charged with a crime were transported to “black sites”.  The US government refuses to acknowledge the existence of many of these secret prisons.

Like “indefinite detention” and “enhanced interrogation techniques”, “extraordinary rendition” is another euphemism used to downplay the campaign of terror waged by the US against the Muslim world.

Friday, October 14, 2011-   A 16 year old American boy, along with nine others, is killed in a targeted CIA drone strike in Yemen. 

Abdulrahman al-Awlaki becomes the third American killed in Yemen by United States drones in just over two weeks.

These attacks made it clear that the most brutal methods, those aerial bombardments normally reserved for citizens of far-away lands, would now be used against Americans as well.

The targeted CIA murder of an American boy would normally cause an outrage.

But he was Muslim, and we had grown to expect this.

It’s hard not to feel that we failed to respond appropriately to this decade long campaign of state repression, and that our failure to act then has helped to create the situation we are in today.

Perhaps we didn’t understand how similar our struggles are.  Maybe we were susceptible to the reactionary media campaigns and thought that these young men from the Muslim world were the same men who burned women with acid in Pakistan or poisoned girls for learning to read in Afghanistan. Perhaps we convinced ourselves that, without knowing each individual’s politics, that they were all religious fundamentalists who wanted a return to an era of the most unbridled patriarchy.  Maybe believing this made it easier for us to ignore their persecution, perhaps it gave us an easier justification for our inability to act than to admit that we were afraid.

It is now apparent that we ignored their struggle at our own peril.

The Precedent

Last month Tarek Mehanna was sentenced to 17 years in prison for translating communiqués issued by Muslim combatants.  This case is just another demonstration of the extreme racism of the judicial system.  But it has become apparent that the State is no longer content to suppress only ethnic minorities.  Any challenge to the system will now be met with the most brutal reprisal.

The prosecutions of animal and earth liberation militants from 2006 to 2009 was as much an attempt by the State to destroy those movements as it was a chance to set a precedent in the conviction of white Americans as terrorists.  Using the fear of the not-so-distant World Trade Center attack and the precedent of the convictions of countless Muslims for doing far less, the State successfully targeted another network of people.  They saw the animal and earth liberation movements as being marginal enough that they could be used as a testing ground for a campaign of persecution that is now aimed at all who disobey.

Somebody Snitchin’

Informants have been critical in the prosecution of nearly all terror cases.  We have been told that their role is to identify plots and to stop them before they are carried out.

The role of the informant is to create a situation that justifies his existence.  An informant does not infiltrate a terror cell.  He creates one.

Many of us believed that informants target the key players of a movement in an attempt to remove influential people, thus striking a crippling blow.

In the 1960s the FBI targeted the leaders of social movements for “neutralization”.  To cut off the head was to kill the body.  We learned from this and developed bodies that could function without a head.  No longer could they destroy us by targeting a few key people.

But they also learned.  Informants no longer look for leaders, they look for followers, those bright-eyed young idealists who will do anything to end this global cycle of suffering.

Our diffuse structure has been met by a diffuse repression.  To target at random, to incarcerate the least threatening among us, sends a message that is much more terrifying than the old method.

They no longer seek to decapitate a movement, but to slash wildly at its body so that none of its parts are safe.

Today, there is nowhere to hide.

The Homefront

The Bay is the epicenter of struggle in this country.  We have almost grown used to the experience of small-scale uprisings.  We have participated in conflicts we never would have thought possible.

Around the country our allies have taken notice.  It is certain that the same is true of our enemies.

In Ohio, Minnesota, Washington, Illinois, even in small town Iowa the State’s secret messengers have reared their heads.

But here they have remained silent.

The current wave of struggle in the Bay began three and a half years ago, and almost immediately evidence of informants was apparent.

At the height of the Oscar Grant movement we learned that the FBI expressed a great deal of interest in the anarchist tendency in the Bay.  It was uncovered that someone was feeding information about anarchist participation in the uprising to law enforcement.  It was suspected that this source was close to or within the anarchist movement.

This person was never discovered.

Around this time a strange figure appeared.  Claiming to be a leader of the “Oakland Panthers”, he publicly exalted the dumbest forms of violent action and considered macho homophobic yelling matches to be an admirable form of struggle.  He physically attacked people at random.  He was trusted by few.  It was revealed that he was a pimp who had worked as an informant for OPD in the recent past, and it was speculated that he still working for them.  3 years later he made an appearance at an Occupy Oakland action, trying to persuade a young anarchist to light something on fire.  He was outed and hasn’t been seen since.

It is apparent that law enforcement has, to some degree, used covert methods against radical movements in the Bay in recent times.  They have reason to fear the fighting force we have developed.  But, with the exception of a washed up pimp-turned fake panther, none of the State’s messengers have been discovered.

Be safe.  There are enemies among us, though we have yet to identify them.

Learn from the cases of the ten men, and from all the prosecutions before them.  Be cautious about your use of the word “trust”.  Don’t let anyone drag you into a situation that you are not prepared for.

Organize your conspiracies carefully.  We must learn to strike harder and more effectively.  The anger we carry with us will one day bring down empires.

Until now the victims of the most brutal state repression have been the same people that have always had the boot on their neck. Though at times the police have clearly targeted people they believed to be white anarchists, the judicial system continued functioning in the same way it always has. In the past three and a half years of struggle in the Bay, nearly all of the people who have done time have been working-class black males.

For those of us who were raised to believe that, because of our race, we would be subjected to the full range of terror the State has to offer, this was not surprising.  In a sense, we do not react with the same emotion to these situations because we have grown to expect them.  That Muslims are indefinitely held in solitary confinement, that black youths fill the jails, we have come to believe that this is simply the order of things.

But this will soon change.

The controlled management units, the sensory deprivation, the enhanced interrogation techniques, the indefinite detention, all the tools of the wars against populations abroad are coming home.

You watched as they tortured Muslims in Iraq, detained Mexicans in Arizona, incarcerated blacks in Oakland, and as you watched you thought to yourself this is fucked up. 

But you said nothing as they were thrown to the lions.

And now they are coming for you.