“A Military-Style Vehicle Is Not The Best Choice For A University Setting.”

Recall from several days ago that UC Berkeley Police, the City of Berkeley Police (unbeknowst to their City Council), and the City of Albany Police Departments had submitted an application for a Bearcat armored vehicle to the Department of Homeland Security.

Amazingly enough, expressing enough outrage and subjecting the planned acquisition to sufficient ridicule was enough to change some important people’s minds.

The statement below regarding plans for the joint acquisition of an armored emergency rescue vehicle was issued today (Thursday, July 5th) by UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau, in coordination with the mayors of Berkeley and Albany.

The University of California Police Department, in collaboration with the Berkeley and Albany city police departments, recently pursued a grant for an armored emergency rescue vehicle. Law enforcement’s interest in obtaining a vehicle that would protect officers during situations involving oncoming gunfire (or to rescue victims during such situations) — such as occurred at Oikos University in Oakland a few months ago — is understandable.

However, the planned acquisition of the vehicle recently came to the attention of campus and city officials. Campus administrators evaluated the proposal and concluded that such a military-style vehicle is not the best choice for a university setting. UC Berkeley officials are in the process of canceling the order for the vehicle. Officials in Berkeley and Albany agree with the University’s decision.

Robert Birgeneau, Chancellor, University of California, Berkeley
Tom Bates, Mayor of Berkeley
Farid Javandel, Mayor of Albany

Reprinted from Daily Kos. Click for full article and comments.

Marchons en Solidarité avec les Étudiants du Québec

“We March in Solidarity with the Students of Quebec.”

Alyssa @alyssa011968
#OO #OccupyOakland join us! It’s beautiful out. #solidarity with #CLASSE

On a beautiful Friday evening, Occupy Oakland marched in solidarity with Quebec students, CLASSE (their student union), and their supporters, who have taken the streets of Montreal. These tens of thousands have stood against and continue to stand against a government that has denied them civil liberties, arrested them without cause, and then refused to negotiate in good faith.

Photobucket
“Solidarity with the infinite strike”

Click here to view the entire photo essay at Daily Kos

Occupying the Farm: The Manure Is About To Hit The Fan.

Two weeks ago, a coalition of urban agriculturalists and occupiers Occupied The Farm in Albany, CA (just north of Berkeley, which is just north of Oakland). This industrious (or should I say, agricultious?) group quickly cleared part of the acreage, plowed it, planted seeds, set up some booths and tables for food and information, and began, well, farming.

Photobucket

It wasn’t previously a farm, exactly. It’s a few acres of land referred to as the Gill Tract, owned by the Regents of the University of California and administered by UC Berkeley. It’s been recently used for agricultural research by a number of UC Professors.

The UC Administration spat and sputtered, occasionally sending police over to threaten the farmer-occupiers, but until recently they had taken no action other than to cut off the water supply (a petty act, of which they should be ashamed, to which workarounds have been found). On Thursday, though, things began to happen.

Read the full article by clicking here.

DANGER! MILITANT MASKED FARM BLOC AHEAD!

In Springtime, Occupiers’ Attention Turns to… Farming?

Wall Street perfidy? Damed straight. Foreclosures? Hell yeah. Police Repression? Hella yeah. And farming? Yup, that too.

Today, Earth Day, a couple of hundred occupiers from around the Bay marched from Berkeley, CA to a plot of land in Albany, CA (just to the north) known as the Gill Tract, then began violent destruction of property pulling up weeds and planting seedlings. They call themselves Occupy the Farm. At the intersection of Marin and San Pablo in Albany The Gill Tract is

… the last remaining 10 acres of Class I agricultural soil in the urbanized East Bay area. The Gill Tract is public land administered by the University of California, which plans to sell it to private developers.

For decades the UC has thwarted attempts by community members to transform the site for urban sustainable agriculture and hands-on education. With deliberate disregard for public interest, the University administrators plan to pave over this prime agricultural soil for commercial retail space, a Whole Foods, and a parking lot.

The plan was kept sooper-seekrit. Marchers did not know where they were going until they got there. Police were not there ahead of the game. An Occupy Oaklander told me that even though the banners for the farm occupation were done in his back yard, even he didn’t know the target. The initial occupation appeared to be well-planned and well-executed.

Click here to read the entire article on Daily Kos

DANGER! MILITANT MASKED FARM BLOC AHEAD!

The Buck Stops. UCD Police Chief Resigns Over Illegal and Insane Pepper Spray Actions.

Photobucket

Some days ago the Reynoso report was issued, part of which detailed the complete disorganization behind the infamous UC Davis “pepper spray” police action. Particularly criticized was then police chief Annette Spicuzza, who, after the incident, took paid leave and has now officially retired. Here is her statement:

I am humbled and distrought. I do not deserve walk amongst you on this campus. I forswear my pension and benefits and am exiling myself to Albania.

For the past seven years, I have accomplished many good things for both the police department and community here at UC Davis; and am grateful to those of you who have remembered this…

The other person singled out for criticism was Chancellor Katehi, who, as the report details, had no conception of the legality of what she was doing, of which organization on campus should be handling the protests, whether she was issuing orders and what specific orders she was indeed issuing, or the consequences of her decisions. If anyone should have resigned even before the report came out, it was Katehi.

Photobucket
Katehi is the recipient of a silent protest as she finally
emerges from a meeting after the spraying and arrests.

Click here to read about the details of Katehi’s incompetence and more in the full post on Daily Kos

What Do You Do When the First Amendment is Under Attack?

From strip searches to the NDAA, from stop and frisk to warrantless tracking, from police ripping cameras away from filmers to “free speech zones,” from Guantanamo Bay to Berkeley’s Sproul Plaza, the Bill of Rights continues to be eroded. But every so often someone manages to push back.

There is a chant that has become de rigueur during Occupy Oakland marches:

What Do We Do When Our Rights Are Under Attack? Stand Up! Fight Back!

It takes a long time and a lot of hard work to fight back against the police state, but in past weeks significant strides have been taken in Occupied Oakland and its environs. The ACLU, BAMN, the NLG, Berkeley, UC Berkeley students and Occupy Oaklanders have begun to try to undo the chilling effect the crackdowns and subsequent prosecutions of peaceful protesters over these last months has engendered.

Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket

Flip over to Daily Kos to read the rest of this article about five statements, lawsuits and local events which have challenged the continued repression of our rights.

PRESS RELEASE: Occupy Oakland Denounces Discriminatory Prosecutions and Policing

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

April 3, 2012

Occupy Oakland activists, UC Berkeley students and civil liberties lawyers gathered today to reject a campaign of repression against protesters in Oakland and Berkeley, including unconstitutional stay-away orders from public spaces and selective prosecutions for trumped up charges such as robbery and “hate crimes.”

Perhaps most egregiously, the Alameda County DA, in an obvious corruption of the spirit of the law, pursued a “hate crimes” prosecution of the “Ice Cream 3”–a group of activists who gathered at an ice cream shop to plan a protest in front of Wells Fargo on Piedmont Avenue. The three activists are accused of using an anti-gay slur during an alleged robbery of a pedestrian who criticized their protest. At best, the “hate crimes enhancement” is an offensive abuse of the justice system. The alleged victim even admitted in pretrial hearings to striking one of her “assailants” and using an offensive racial slur during their confrontation.

“It’s disappointing but not surprising that the Ice Cream 3 were held to answer,” said attorney Dan Siegel, former legal advisor to Mayor Jean Quan, of the firm Siegel & Yee, who represented the defendants during a pretrial hearing. “In Alameda, even a ham sandwich would be held to answer and required to go to trial.”

Siegel’s law firm also represents the victims of a vicious assault, who found the DA’s office and OPD indifferent to their plight. The two Oakland residents were viciously assaulted–one of them requiring substantial facial reconstructive surgery–while their assailants repeatedly hurled homophobic slurs. The DA’s refusal to prosecute the assault at all, much less as a hate crime, while enthusiastically pursuing hate crimes prosecution against political activists, reveals a campaign of selective prosecution meant to stifle the free speech and political activism of the Occupy movement. In conjunction with the stay-away orders, these actions are an attempt to “tame” the Occupy movement–as DA Nancy O’Malley recently characterized her policies in an op-ed for the San Francisco Chronicle.

Dozens of Occupiers have also been given stay-away orders from the park in front of Oakland City Hall, known as Oscar Grant Plaza, requiring them to remain up to 300 yards away from the area. These orders, given to many activists who haven’t been convicted of any crime at all, presume guilt and deny these activists the right to take their grievances to the Oakland City Council, which is at the heart of the stay away zone. Many activists have been given stay-away orders for participating in nonviolent protests that occurred far from the Plaza.

Several UC Berkeley students who were victims of a brutal and well-publicized police assault after setting up an Occupy camp on November 9, 2011 on campus, have also been given stay-away orders from all UC property. These orders bar students from participating in an ambiguously-defined list of activities, including legal protests otherwise protected by the First Amendment. This is especially troubling considering UC Berkeley’s historic association with the Free Speech Movement.

The ACLU has submitted habeas corpus petitions to challenge the stay-away orders issued against Occupy Oakland protesters. “In this country, it’s unacceptable to keep demonstrators out of the public square because the government thinks they might engage in illegal conduct in a future demonstration,” wrote ACLU staff attorney Michael Risher. “Courts have made clear that there is a special value to being able to speak in front of the seat of government authority, be it the White House or City Hall.”

While the District Attorney pulls out all the stops to chill the rights of Oakland and Berkeley activists to free speech, not a single police officer in Alameda County has been disciplined, relieved from active duty, or prosecuted for their role in several high-profile acts of violence and suppression of civil rights. This includes the officers who shot Iraq veteran Scott Olsen in the head and videographer Scott Campbell in the leg with less-than-lethal munitions and the officers who beat Iraq veteran Kayvan Sabeghi.

In New York City, Occupy Wall Street has faced a similar campaign of police repression and has called for a general strike on May 1 as a part of a campaign against it. Occupy Oakland has endorsed this call for a general strike as have many other Occupy groups around the country. Additionally, Occupy 4 Prisoners plans an action on April 24 called “Occupy the Justice Department” in part to protest repression against political activists.

REFERENCES:

ACLU: “Stay Away Orders Against Protesters Are Unconstitutional” http://www.aclunc.org/issues/freedom_of_press_and_speech/stay_away_orders_against_protesters_are_unconstitutional.shtml

“Defense lawyer threatened with arrest, police report doctored in preliminary hearing of Ice Cream 3” – http://www.oscargrantplazagazette.com/2012/03/18/defense-lawyer-threatened-with-arrest-police-report-doctored-in-preliminary-hearing-of-ice-cream-three/

“Politicized ‘Hate Crimes’, the OPD and District Attorney O’Malley” – http://hyphenatedrepublic.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/politicized-hate-crimes-the-opd-and-district-attorney-omalley/

Berkeley City Council To Vote On Occupy Arrests

Photo Courtesy of socialistlib510 (SL510)

 

Unlike the City Council in Oakland which has remained silent while OPD and the District Attorney Nancy O’Malley brutalize and criminalize Occupy Oakland protesters, the Berkeley City Council could soon weigh in on the side of protesters free speech and assembly rights.  On Tuesday, April 3, the Berkeley City Council will take a vote on whether or not they will send a letter requesting O’Malley drop all charges related to the November 9 arrest of 13 protesters. All the protesters, except UC Berkeley associate professor of English Celeste Langan, were given stay away orders.

Read more about the vote in Soumya Karlamangla’s article in The Daily Calfornian:

http://www.dailycal.org/2012/03/28/berkeley-city-council-to-weigh-in-on-charges-against-occupy-cal-protesters/

On the November 9 Stay-Away Orders: The University and its “Lawful Business”

Reblogged from berkeleynov9:

Click to visit the original post

-written by three people among the thirteen charged

We are graduate students and teachers at UC Berkeley.  Like thousands of other people here at Berkeley, we have participated in rallies and demonstrations and marches against the privatization of the University of California.  In early March of this year, however, we each received letters from the Alameda County District Attorney informing us that criminal complaints had been filed against us. 

Read more… 1,304 more words